Salvage Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection (ePLND) isn't all that popular in the US because of the difficulty in finding and removing
all the cancerous LNs:
/pcnrv.blogspot.com/2017/01/were-still-not-very-good-at-finding.html/pcnrv.blogspot.com/2017/02/pelvic-lymph-node-treatment-area-is.htmlThere is some recent evidence that whole pelvic radiation with ADT is a better idea than picking off lymph nodes one at a time (for which we have no evidence of survival benefit);
/pcnrv.blogspot.com/2017/12/salvage-whole-pelvic-radiation-after.htmlThink of it this way - why would the cancer cells stop at
only the LNs where it was detected? Remember that even the DCFPyL PET scan cannot detect LN metastases smaller that 4 mm.
As for SEs, surgical LN dissection carries a risk of lymphocele and lymphedema. The risk is worse, the more LNs are removed. Radiation carries a much lower risk of those but does carry a risk of small bowel side effects.