Duck2 said...
I don’t understand why so many promote 1 pathologist. There are very qualified pathologists at all the cancer centers of excellence.
I had zero doubt about my pathologist at Cleveland Clinic.
You make a good point. We forget that all medical specialties are trained at certified centers and pass the same boards. (assuming they are board certified). I recall when I had a severe tibula/fibula/ankle fracture 30+ years ago. At the large hospital in the small MS town where I worked, I had 2 metal plates and 17 screws placed to hold it all together again.
2 years later, I was really wanting to resume down hill snow skiing, and was given the OK by my surgeon. But I still had pain, and was paranoid. So, I made an appointment at an orthopedic center near to Snowbird and Alta ski resorts in Salt Lake City. I figured they must deal with lots of ski injuries, so they ought to know if I was safe to go or not. Well, the did X-rays, and when the head guy and his resident came in, they told me how superior my patch job was, and that I should be good to go. They asked where I had it done and if I knew where my ortho surgeon had trained. When I answered "Tupelo, MS and Jackson, MS", they exclaimed something like "Wow, that is about
the most advanced ortho center in the country, and we often go there for training in the newest techniques and continuing education."! LOL!
So, it can be hard for us to ascertain who the best in a specialty is. Although, some guys are a lot busier post training than others, and thus get more experience. But really, how are we to know. Natural talent also enters in to it. How are we to judge that? Who really knows the final outcome of any given surgeon or pathologist or whatever specialty? We might know if they are very busy for many years, but how can we judge their talent?