Perineural Invasion Noted on Post-op Pathology Report

Hi all. I had a question about perineural invasion.

I'll assume that most know what perineural invasion is, so I'll spare the explanation, but although my biopsy report showed that there was no perineural invasion seen, my post-op pathology showed that it was present. However, my urologist told me that a high percentage of his patients’s post-op pathology reports showed perinural invasion, and that since my report showed that there was no capsular penetration, negative margins and negative seminal vesicles, that it was not a cause for concern.

I also had post-op path perineural invasion.  My urologist also doesn't think it would be a problem. He claims that since the invasion was found inside the prostate, that doesn't mean that it was also on the outside since I also had negative margins.  I have also read that the nerves are one of those paths of least resistant when the cancer is growing and needs room to escape.  I read in Walsh's book or Catalona's site that some pathologist don't even mention it on the pre-op biopsy reports as it has no significance on the outcome.

However if I had known about it before hand I would have insisted on taking as much as the nerves as possible and would have lived without the sex.  Like I have said before I would rather be a live steer than and dead bull!