Two things. One is that an educated GI treating a patient who is otherwise a good surgery risk will, given the state of the research today, absolutely consider the j-pouch the primary surgical option for UC. Some people choose permanent ostomies for reasons of their own, but surgeons who do both procedures will almost always encourage you to try the j-pouch because it works so often. The success rate for the surgery, as measured by patients reporting good or excellent quality of life, is 92.3%. That is higher than any other single medical option for treating UC. But lack of information about
that is not uncommon among GIs--they are not surgeons. (And as my second opinion GI pointed out: "My j-pouch patients are so much better that I rarely see them again.") Talk to a surgeon who does the surgery all the time to get the best sense of what the options are for you.
The other is that the ostomy bag (which will probably be part of your experience of j-pouch surgery) is not nearly as bad as you are imagining. You would not need a wedding dress with extra room. I continued to wear my usual clothes and even people who knew I had the bag couldn't figure out where the heck I was stashing it.
I'm not saying it was a picnic, but it was so much better than having active UC and the constant threat of colon cancer hanging over my head that I barely know how to describe the improvement. The entire area of my brain that used to be taken up figuring out where all the bathrooms are was liberated as soon as the first surgery was over. And I knew I would not die of colon cancer (I had dysplasia) or of fulminant UC. You've had a liver transplant, so I don't have to tell you how valuable it is to dodge that bullet! But you need to be free to really live the second chance at life that you got, and either surgery is worth it if it will do that for you better than the drugs.
Post Edited (Charlotte Gilman) : 9/26/2008 9:03:10 PM (GMT-6)