I was just sent home from the colonoscopy with some pictures and a note written in the margin "looks like ulcerative colitis. pancolitis with focal sparing"
I was even unsure about
scheduling a followup appointment or with who - my primary that had ordered the scoping, or the GI I had met for 5 minutes that morning, who had presumably written the note.
I eventually sorted out that the GI would treat me, and got some prescript
ions phoned in, and got a first-available appointment for about
a week later.
So yes, I wish I had been told a lot more. I would have liked an info packet that described exactly what UC was (and was not, e.g., result of nerves). I guess it is difficult to give exact information since I did not even have an official diagnosis of idiopathic UC until after I met with the GI and he did some other tests (e.g., rule out c-diff). Still, explaining that 1) UC was one type of IBD, that 2) further steps would be taken to indicate exactly what type of UC (or even IBD) I had, 3) that this was likely chronic lifelong issue, and 4) that finding the right treatment usually involved working through a list of increasingly stronger drugs and therapies, and 5) some lists of books and online resources that might be useful for me or my family.
IF I had to pick the ONE thing, I guess it would have to be some understanding of autoimmune - all I knew was that I had ulcerations.
Post Edited (DBwithUC) : 3/8/2012 3:59:57 PM (GMT-7)