Posted 1/8/2013 1:27 AM (GMT 0)
IMO in medical literature FT is very well accepted for c.diff. The "editorial" may be correct that hospitals do not want to call attention to c.diff. Also, there are likely hospitals that are resistant to housing the procedure.
But in the medical research community, for c.diff (not the same as UC) the very very high cure rate of FT is broadly cited.
But, a c-scope to deliver FT, or even medically supervised enema (e.g., donor screened) will cost much much more than a $60 pill. It may be crap but it won't be free!