garylouisville said...
Diets do not work in everyone and when they do certain diets work in some and other diets work in others. The trouble is, for those where diet can help, it's about impossible to know which one of the diets will help you. It's often just trial and error. On top of that some diets can make you worse. I think posters do a disservice to others when they harp and harp and harp that you have to stay the course and do the diet for months or even years before you really get any benefit. If you have chosen the wrong diet then staying on it for months or years can not only be the wrong thing to do but it can be a very huge inconvenience to do all that for nothing. I really haven't seen too many people here who have had great benefit from these diets as far as UC and remission goes. Yes, there are some but many still wind up having UC symptoms even with their diets and all they can talk about is how much better they feel overall due to the diet.
I kind of screwed up and thought that these starches were evil. I'm wondering how much damage I did to my colon while omitting these starches over the years. Either way, I'm having some luck with resistant starches now, as my stools are a bit more formed. Obviously, I cannot handle some of the roughage but I think over time, the diet may end up healing my colon, at least enough to handle some of the rough foods. Knowing which starches work is a matter of trial and error -- I know for sure that I won't be able to handle beans, but pasta and whole grain flour seem to be okay in limited quantities.
This is good news for people with gastrointestinal disorders. Medicines may be necessary but diet will be the first line of defense in terms of prevention. I think the outlook on IBD treatments is very good now that more research is emerging in the dietary field.