Sibby said...
chriskresser.com/the-high-price-of-antibiotic-use-can-our-guts-ever-fully-recover
Also, there was another study that showed infant's gut flora did not return to normal after 18-months while having one course of antibiotics. I can't find the blood link, but it was in the news last year.
Chris Kresser is spot on in his analysis. The only way to possibly return the flora to "normal" is through fecal transplantation, which is now becoming viable option for all types of digestive disorders. In most cases of antibiotic therapy, the flora does not properly return to normal, setting the host up for health issues in the future. They've tracked the health outcomes of babies who took antibiotics vs those who didn't, so it's easy to pinpoint where the problems originate from. I despise it when people use the genetics excuse for these diseases. No, it's not genetics; not by a long shot because people with no prior genetic susceptibility are developing IBD in "sanitized" nations.
Some of the responses in this thread are pretty saddening. It's difficult to make people understand that most antibiotic courses don't yield positive outcomes. There are more effective alternatives - bacteriophages, botanicals, herbals and even some lesser formulations like nystatin (but garlic is just as effective, if not better according to the studies).
I haven't been able to deal with the anger of being given all the misinformation about
the antibiotics that I took. It's one of those what-ifs that keeps playing over and over again in my mind considering how preventable it was. UC patients have to work on the double to restore their missing flora. I'm doing everything possible to recover from it - fermented foods, prescript
assist, dirt probiotics, kefir, etc.