fruitgirl said...
I think I found that actual study you reference (not a report about the study), and the parents were the ones recording the amount/severity/ect. of coughing, so perhaps THEY were influenced, and the placebo effect was acting on them, so they reported the cough as being less severe.
My point about Pavlov's dogs is that conditioning takes repeated exposures, as with Little Albert. My daughter did not have repeated exposures to Tamiflu, or any meds, really.
Fair enough.
I would assume the parents keep close watch on the children and know if they are sleeping well or not after administration of the placebo, so maybe they (parents) could have been influenced by it, but maybe not...
Nevertheless, the study implied that anything is better than non-treatment for children's coughs... even the placebo, so I can't help but think that it crosses over to other medications that are given to infants for transient sicknesses.
Here is the abridged powerpoint presentation from JAMA Pediatrics that sums up the study. They conclude that:
A significant placebo effect exists in the treatment of young children with nonspecific acute cough because the agave nectar and placebo both resulted in perceived improvement of child symptoms by parents compared with no treatment.But... your point about
Tamiflu helping her makes sense, since tylenol and other medications did not help.
It's time for me to stop going Captain Ahab on pharmaceutical companies and acknowledge they can help some people.
Best.
Post Edited (Guardian7) : 3/26/2015 4:04:33 PM (GMT-6)