Jonny_Murray said...
That's fair enough NiceCupofTea, I'm sorry that medication did not work for you. I was simply making the point that this site does not provide a good overall perspective on the general experience people have with IBD because it tends to attract people who are going through a difficult time. In other words you get a distorted view that is weighted towards the more (and sometimes far more) negative experiences. Therefore I tend to take the views of long term posters with a pinch of salt, especially in comparison with my consultant and GI nurse who have practical experience of treating patients with these medications over more than a decade.
I absolutely agree with you.
I can even use myself as an example. I was diagnosed with Crohn's in 2000. I wasn't fobbed off with IBS for years, therefore I was diagnosed while my disease was still early onset. For the first 4-5 years I had very mild symptoms and even doubted my Crohn's diagnosis (stupid; I should have discussed my doubts with the GI but I never did). Long story short, the thought of joining a Crohn's forum in that period wouldn't even have occurred to me. Even when my disease took a turn for the worse, it took another few years before I became motivated enough to join a forum.
I've also got a brother with IBD. He's had it for slightly longer than me, but unlike me, his disease never became severe. He's in remission pretty much nearly all the time. Takes the occasional course of steroids. (Apparently the last course didn't work, but the flare-up still ended anyway.) He definitely does not post on any IBD forums.
It's like with Remicade. My GI said he only knew 3 people for whom Remicade didn't work: I made it 4 people >_>. I found that a bit weird, tbh. From HW, I'd project a 50% success rate for Remicade. That said, it isn't much comfort when it all goes pear-shaped for
you.