Judy2 said...
It really doesn't matter how much sedation you were given. The key is that, any time a patient is in that much distress, the procedure should be stopped. They could have then waited to give the medication more time to take effect or terminated the endoscopy totally. They aren't supposed to be in the business of torturing people.
(Actually, I've always suspected the emphasis on not giving sedation was more of a cost saving measure than a patient comfort measure.) I have propofil for a colonoscopy, and I'm definitely not a wimp.
I agree with this. They should've stopped, waited 10 minutes and then tried again, more slowly. It didn't sound like you had anyone there reassuring you either. I've never had an endoscopy but I had a flex sig without sedation, and it was awful - the gas and air literally didn't seem to do anything. A nice nurse got me through that, otherwise I might have actually insisted on them stopping. (God knows how anyone in the world manages to have a colonoscopy without sedation: I stand in awe of them.)
But then again, from what I remember of the hospital malaika is at I'm not surprised. The doctors there had zero people skills 10-15 years ago, and they still seem to have zero people skills. Robots would have more empathy.