GC4249 said...
Mayo Clinic categorises UC according to several systemic criteria, including number of BMs per day, quantity of bleeding, cramping pains, fever etc. In terms of BMs, mild UC = fewer than 4 per day; moderate UC = 4-6 BMs per day; and severe UC = more than 6 BMs per day.
But these are objective criteria. Subjectively, if the systemic affects of UC are impacting your quality of life then it might be considered severe .... certainly most people going to the toilet 15 or more times a day would find it hard to be functional on a regular day-to-day basis.
No, they're not objective criteria, any more than any other research tool used to quantify
symptoms are objective. Look up the CDAI, aka Crohn's Disease Activity Index. Remission is defined as a score below 150. Using an online CDAI calculator, I worked out a score of 103 for somebody who has: 42 liquid stools a week (6 a day on average), 7 daily ratings of 'mild' abdominal pain, and 7 daily ratings of general well-being as 'poor'. That person would be comfortably in remission according to the CDAI.
These symptom assessment tools are an absolute joke. My hospital used a simplified version of the CDAI called the Harvey Bradshaw Index, which had me classified me as being in remission a few months ago, despite an extremely high calprotectin result, raised blood inflammatory markers, and a flex sig which showed, in my consultant's words, 'classic' Crohn's.
In a nutshell, I would run away as far as I could from any doctor who used only symptoms as a guide to disease severity/activity and didn't run blood/stool tests, colonoscopies/flex sigs, MRI scans, etc.