IamCurious said...
It could very well be that somebody like brucen has lymphonodular hyperplasia and not UC, or he may have lymphonodular hyperplasia (or some other similar condition) in addition to having UC.
So you guys know more than Brucen's GI?
I might. You never know. It wouldn't be the first time, or the last, that I know more about
IBD than a random GI does.
IamCurious said...
The 2nd study was a comprehensive search using PubMed to identify relevant scientific studies on diet and/or nutrients and their role in IBD. The results of those “Epidemiological studies highlight the key role of diet in IBD development, and many IBD patients report diet as a triggering factor in relapse of disease”
But you guys seem to know more than the people who gathered those scientific studies.
It's a lame tactic, not to mention a logical fallacy, to say "I guess you think you know more.." whenever somebody criticizes a study.
I guess you think that all studies are above criticism? (See how logical fallacies work?)
I know enough, having seen many studies on diet, to know that it's tough to draw ANY conclusions about
diet helping or not. I also know that epidemiological studies are wrought with flaws, that people often report their dietary intake inaccurately, and that properly controlled, prospective dietary studies are very hard to do, expensive, and time consuming.