So-- the Human Resources clerk's supervisor got in on the act & began insisting to my boss that I have to retire on Jan. 4th because Jan. 1 is a holiday (followed by weekend) plus stated that we staff MUST come to work on our last day of employment, totally absurd. I decided to ask our dept. head whether she had kept a paper copy of the Director of Human Resources's e-memo advocating retirement on the 1st of the month in general. Luckily, she HAD. By this time, she was getting fed up with HR, too, so she gave my boss a copy-- since he either had never read it or forgot about
its existence! Yesterday he contacted the Human Resources supervisor again, and then e-mailed me to say that the guy STILL insisted I had to retire on Jan. 4! Was I ever furious? (YES-- but I suspected it was better not to let them know they rile me.) While my boss was out lunching today, I sent him a very concise reply, stating that I stand by my original letter of intent to retire on Jan. 1 PER e-memo of the Director of Human Resources circulated on such-and-such date, AND adding that the written contract we work under does not say anything to prohibit retirement on a holiday nor to mandate that we show up at work on our last day of employment-- which makes the Human Resources supervisor & clerk guilty of arbitrary, capricious, and illogical behavior in my case. Then I gave them an "out" by concluding that they must have consulted an outdated administrative manual!!!! My approach seems to be working because my boss now says he is resubmitting my original letter with Jan. 1 date for retirement ... (sigh) JUST GLAD MY UC MED IS GETTING ME THRU THIS NONSENSE!!!!!!!!! / Old Hat (30 yrs with left-sided UC ... [etc.])
Post Edited (Old Hat) : 12/11/2009 10:27:05 PM (GMT-7)