DocGP:
So sorry to hear about your situation. Again let me stress I am no MD, I am a dentist and person who has a long history of UC and in dealing with various GI docs. This is just my impression about what your saying and base on my personal experiences. It sounds like Asacol is doing squat for you and maybe I would get another pathologist to read your path slides concerning the c-scope or see a different GI doc for a different opinion. By the way how is your blood work? Any elevated wbc? ESR? C=reactive protien? What about your Hg level and Hct and platelets, etc...
I was working with one GI doc for several years, all the while he had me on Asacol which did nothing for my UC, infact over several years my UC got worse and my colonscopies also showed spreading colitis, especailly in severity of inflammation. That GI doc said everything was great and stay on the Asacol. I shed a lot of blood in those years and eventually accepted it as normal. My Hg eventually dropped to around 8.
I then went to Yale and had one of the best GI docs do a colonscopy and said nothing. The GI doc said stay on the Asacol and the doc even questioned whether I had colits at all. Similar to what you said. The doc was surprised when the path said chronic and moderate inflammation however. That said the doc said stay the course on the Asacol. I went to another GI doc who reviewed my biopsies shortly after Yale and said it's obvious my colon is getting worse and worse and that Asacol is either doing nothing for me or is fact hurting me. He told me to get off of it and start Imuran. My wbc at the time was in the 20-30 with a large % being eosinophils. When I asked him about that he said my UC has nothing to do with the high level of eos.
I then went to Harvard and found a clinical director of eosinophilic disorders (allergist/immunologist) and also a GI who only treats UC/Chron's. They are both at Harvard. They immediately said my UC was getting worse and to get off of the Asacol and start Imuran. They went on to say that the high wbc and specifically the eos were definitely from the UC. They started me on Imuran and I am doing much better with almost a perfect colon, clinical remission and histologically as well.
When I went back to the GI doc who said the high eos count was not due to the UC he told me "of course the eosinophils are due to UC." He said this because he holds a high respect for the Harvard based work up they did on me. They were extensive.
The point I am trying to make is that you definitely need to stop, re-examine what you actually have. I would have the path slides re-read by a new pathologist and see a different GI doc. It's well known that Asacol can hurt more than help. Sorry for the longwinded story but I thought it might be relevant to you. If I wasn't so persistent I would have taken the opinion of the eariler doc and would be taking a drug for leukemia or just kept taking Asacol.
Good luck to you. I hope this helps.
MyUC