notsosicklygirl said...
Mine progressed from proctitis to pancolitis. I think it would have progressed eventually regardless of how I had treated it. I did notice a difference in symptoms between the proctitis flaring and the pancolitis. Pancolitis involves a lot of pain and cramping for me, proctitis didn't so much. Proctitis was a nuisance because I didn't have good control and I was seeing quite a bit of blood but I was able to manage it with Canasa alone - I considered myself fortunate for that. Some people can't get proctitis under control easily at all and being urgency is one of the main symptoms, it can be a real hassle. When my pancolitis was flaring, I could barely leave the house because of unpredictability. I never knew how many times or when I would need a toilet, whether it would be painful or require me to stay in the bathroom for an hour sitting in pain - I also had urgency to top it off. Not fun. My diagnosis changed from my sigscope one year to a colonoscopy the following year. I wasn't on oral meds and I was uninsured and unable to get treatment sooner. I had to join a clinical trial to get a colonoscopy.
This is where USA fails. No insurance, in Canada even if you are on wellfare, you are insured, you can get 10000 colonoscopies and it won't cost you 1 cent. Again if you are unnemployed, you get can all your meds paid for. Clinical trial just to get a colonoscopy, what a joke.