I begin to see. I have not seen any research that Vit-K can CAUSE IBD. It is associated and cause/consequence relations are unclear. Perhaps this is why I did not get as excited as you did. I think you misunderstood the causal implications. You have confused correlation with causation.
I would get excited if someone posted a causal role of Vit-K in IBD. Or, even a causal role in putting IBD into remission. Sadly, we are not there yet.
While I don't rule out the possibility that Vit-K deficiency leads to IBD in genetically susceptible individuals (it is as plausible a trigger as many mentioned), what is known about
IBD and Vit-K and the gut microbes point to it being a consequence.
1) We depend on gut microbes to make Vit-K for us, and with IBD there is seriously diminished and dysregulated gut microbes (i.e., less/missing makers).
2) We do not absorb Vit-K very well even when healthy, and an inflamed colon seems like it would absorb Vit-K even more poorly.
It would be interesting to see work on the amount of Vit-K available for absorption, of CD vs UC differences (because the latter group have healthy small intestines to absorb Vit-K), and any link between Vit-K and mucosal healing.
When they discuss vitamins, the most recent reviews of IBD and nutrition focus onthe free-radical scavenging of A,C, and E, as well as the immuno-modulating properties of D. Vit-K is not mentioned in the reviews.
I will do a check for specific Vit-K recent research.
----
p.s. Because I DID READ what you posted, I was puzzled.Nothing there mentions causality, and your causality assumption was not revealed until I asked - so please, less snark.
Post Edited (DBwithUC) : 11/15/2012 11:48:20 AM (GMT-7)