Posted 1/14/2013 9:18 PM (GMT 0)
I have ulcerative colitis, I'm a 31-year-old guy. And I need surgery for ulcerative colitis.
To say the truth, I already had colectomy, but nothing has been created at the time, as they weren't sure I had the u. colitis, or the crohn's; now that they appear to have concluded for the first, the natural course would be the j-pouch.
But, actually, I have some doubts. I have, in some extent, the reason to think that perhaps keeping the rectum would be the better choice for me.
The first reason is: if I keep the rectum, and make an IRA (ileorectal anastomosis), then, I would have the chance to switch it to IPAA (Total Proctocoloectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis) if in the future I need it. The opposite is not possible.
The second reason is: if I keep the rectum, and the rectum can be treated with medicines, above all, local suppositories and enemas, perhaps, I'll have less bathroom trips. There are studies where is showed that ira results are comparable, and women get the IRA to have more chance to be pregnant and make a family. IPAA is a bit risky also for men, IPAA is less risky. I believe that sexuality is easier having an IRA and not an IPAA.
The third reason is: I'm afraid to lose the rectum. This means that, if the j-pouch surgery goes bad, I have no choice than the ostomy.
Unfortunately, there are so many success stories with IPAA; while I can't find noone with ulcerative colitis who had IRA and is happy. Do you know anyone experience? Or your experience?
Thank you mates.