pb4 said...
emilp89 clearly made a type-o writing "you can't" as you can clearly see in the link they provided it says "you-can-have-both" so emilp89 obviously meant can not can't.
The link says "can you have both?". Im 99% sure I know which link that is and im 99% sure its one that argues you CANT have both. I used to agree with all of its points, until I found that cases studies I referenced above.