Many of us feel 100% normal on prednisone, but it is only a temporary rescue medication that buys us time while our other UC medications are given time to work. The goal is to taper off of pred without issue. However, what you describe (re-occurrence of blood at 10-mgs of pred) is a tale-tale sign of her maintenance medications being insufficient. What needs to happen is go back on a higher dose of pred (you did to 20mgs), adjust her maintenance medications, give that adjustment time to work, and then resume the pred taper again.
"Due to the harsh nature of this drug I am reluctant..." This type of thinking is going to make your daughter's experience with UC a lot more difficult than it otherwise needs to be. The fact is she is a moderate/severe pancolitis case (pancolitis being the largest extent of UC) and has been hospitalized, and those things together place your daughter in the highest-risk category of UC (of relapse, of further hospitalization, and of ultimately needing a surgery) and the biggest reason to go on the stronger medications earlier in order to control her UC fast, and get her UC into a remission (that is an absence of UC symptoms). I don't mean to scare you needlessly, but what I do mean to do is stress that you should not take her UC pancolitis lightly, and under-treat it as a consequence thereof. I'd follow your doctor's advice and go on the imuran, and likely ask about
going on a biologic medication at the same time (remicade/humira/simponi).
The goal is to hit a UC flare hard, get the UC patient in a long, lasting remission (where she'll be essentially normal for years), and that will produce the best quality of life and the least cause for suffering. While, you could kick-the-can-down-the-road and try many smaller things that may/may not work and that could result in more lost school, many more months of struggling, and you do worry about
impacts on growth-rate and other things of that nature.
Most USA gasteroenteroligists are strong proponents of using the top-down-approach especially with pediatric cases of UC, of using the stronger medications earlier, and that is what I am describing in the above. As they have to live with the consequences of UC the longest and you want their quality of life to be the best possible. Would you rather try and stop a fire when it is still a smoldering ember? Or would you rather wait until the entire house is engulfed in fire before trying your strongest treatments? Thinking is knock it hard, early, and fast, and move on with your life.
There's still the bottom-up approach of using the least amount of medications possible, which some adhere to. Just know there will be a lot more trial-and-error, a longer stay on pred, a gradual escalation of med doses and adding more meds, and it might ultimately end up with using the stronger meds anyways. It took me 2-years to achieve my initial remission with the bottom-up approach, and second, very severe flareup as a consequence thereof.
We all worry about
starting new classes of medications. A good read is this by the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America, which discusses the risks versus benefits of using the stronger meds on UC patients. Nothing is without risk, but the benefit often far outweighs those risks. It's easy to fear when you don't know the odds, and often reassuring to see that risks are indeed much smaller than we initially believe them to be:
Webcast:
programs.rmei.com/CCFA139VL/presentation/player.htmlTranscript
: http://www.ccfa.org/assets/pdfs/risk-and-benefits-transcript
.pdf