zack36 said...
Hi
... What they are saying is that if we can't control the leaked gas fluids whatever they call it Then....the only option is the removal of the bowel. ...
The problem is that part of what you are saying is incomplete or makes no sense.
ABX do not actually remove waste material from the gut. Over time, your body has to adsorb that stuff. What ABS does is kill bacteria/infection in that stuff and in the surrounding tissue.
They may be telling you that if the waste material causes infection in the adjacent portions of the colon, or more generally in other organs via sepsis, that removing some or all of the colon may be necessary.
But because it makes no sense as you state things above, it is hard to comment. You need more understanding of what effect of ABX not working would require colectomy, and why complete and not partial resection. IF you get answers to those questions, you might find more on-point responses here.
The other issue is that you have misconceptions about
j-pouch and j-pouch surgery recommendation. This seems dominated by concerns about
a bag.
The question of whether your perforation could
open up again is "not likely once healed". In fact the scar tissue might be stronger than the surrounding tissue.
So, get more info. Get things sorted. Let us know. When there is gunk in the abdominal cavity outside the colon, the only option is not to remove the colon. IF you are hearing that you need to get an understanding of why. My thought is that you are hearing wrong, or leaving somethign out. IF the gunk causes further damage to the colon, especially portions of dead tissue, then the need for resection make sense, but you need to understand why they are saying the whole colon.
IF you do need the whole colon removed, then (and only then) should you turn to issues of number of steps, and chanced of ultimate pouch failure.
I hope this helps you get organized info
Post Edited (DBwithUC) : 8/21/2018 2:07:48 PM (GMT-6)